Summary and discussion of: “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” Statistics Journal Club, [removed]Dallas Card and Shashank Srivastava December 10, 2014

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-12-17 17:40:50 Knowledge Publication bias Statistical power Statistical hypothesis testing P-value False discovery rate Statistical significance Null hypothesis Meta-analysis Statistics Hypothesis testing Science		Summary and discussion of: “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” Statistics Journal Club, [removed]Dallas Card and Shashank Srivastava December 10, 2014 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.stat.cmu.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 1,05 MB Share Document on Facebook

	Journal of Machine Learning Research514 Submitted 3/08; Revised 7/08; Published 2/09 Controlling the False Discovery Rate of the Association/Causality Structure Learned with the PC Algorithm DocID: 1tr9r - View Document
	False Discovery Rate Control and Statistical Quality Assessment of Annotators in Crowdsourced Ranking DocID: 1toos - View Document
	NeuroImage 15, 870 – doi:nimg, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate 1 Christopher R. DocID: 1t5lK - View Document
	Controlling the false discovery rate at detection of biological aberrations in -omic data Djork-Arné Clevert a,b, Andreas Mayr a, Andreas Mitterecker a, Günter Klambauer a, and Sepp Hochreiter a,* a DocID: 1rHgM - View Document
	Microsoft PowerPoint - 第6-2章-Class Comparision.pptx DocID: 1qsOW - View Document