Cite as: 536 U. S. ____[removed]STEVENS, J., dissenting

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-11-27 12:00:47 Government Separation of powers Political philosophy Republican Party of Minnesota v. White Supreme Court of the United States John Paul Stevens Judicial independence United States Constitution Judicial activism Philosophy of law Law Constitutional law		Cite as: 536 U. S. ____[removed]STEVENS, J., dissenting Add to Reading List Source URL: www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca Download Document from Source Website File Size: 74,51 KB Share Document on Facebook

	REPORT ON The Nomination of Merrick B. Garland to the United States Supreme Court WWW.THEGARLANDRECORD.ORG DocID: 1oU7y - View Document
	ANDREW KOPPELMAN John Paul Stevens Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science Affiliated faculty, Philosophy Dept. Northwestern University Northwestern University School of Law DocID: 1gwaF - View Document
	Ideological Drift among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When, and How Important?∗ Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn & Jeffrey A. Segal† Abstract When President George W. Bush declared that his Supreme Court DocID: 19Gmi - View Document
	» Print “Ask the Author”: Andrew Martin \| SCOTUSblog:04 AM - SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/wp - DocID: 19sVn - View Document
	The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims: Has It Mastered Chevron’s Step Zero? Linda D. Jellum1 INTRODUCTION It has been twenty-five years since Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. DocID: 19lQt - View Document