<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Stealth aircraft / Aircraft / Military-industrial complex / Monoplanes / Quadrennial Defense Review / Government / United States Department of Defense / Robert McNamara / Franklin C. Spinney / Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor / Military budget of the United States / William Cohen
Date: 2015-10-27 01:38:59
Stealth aircraft
Aircraft
Military-industrial complex
Monoplanes
Quadrennial Defense Review
Government
United States Department of Defense
Robert McNamara
Franklin C. Spinney
Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
Military budget of the United States
William Cohen

Strategic Review (Published in FallPorkbarrels & Budgeteers What Went Wrong with the Defense Review

Add to Reading List

Source URL: pogoarchives.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 59,90 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

DEFENSE POWER GAMES  The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the US Government.

DEFENSE POWER GAMES The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the US Government.

DocID: 1lLwj - View Document

Microsoft Word - 1 AAAAA Preface Ready to printdoc

Microsoft Word - 1 AAAAA Preface Ready to printdoc

DocID: 1lFBc - View Document

Microsoft Word - 8  Wheeler Chapter on Decoding Cost Ready to Printdoc

Microsoft Word - 8 Wheeler Chapter on Decoding Cost Ready to Printdoc

DocID: 1lzWD - View Document

INDEPENDENT POSITION PAPER:  THREE REASONS WHY THE ATF SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED FOR ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT  Franklin C. Spinney

INDEPENDENT POSITION PAPER: THREE REASONS WHY THE ATF SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED FOR ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT Franklin C. Spinney

DocID: 1lyif - View Document

Strategic Review (Published in FallPorkbarrels & Budgeteers What Went Wrong with the Defense Review

Strategic Review (Published in FallPorkbarrels & Budgeteers What Went Wrong with the Defense Review

DocID: 1luyK - View Document