<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Strickland v. Washington / Plea bargain / Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Plea / Ineffective assistance of counsel / Law / Criminal law / United States constitutional criminal procedure
Date: 2014-11-14 12:11:50
Strickland v. Washington
Plea bargain
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Plea
Ineffective assistance of counsel
Law
Criminal law
United States constitutional criminal procedure

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 10, 2014 Session Heard at McKenzie1 CLARENCE NESBIT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Shelby County

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.tsc.state.tn.us

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 188,08 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

1  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________ 3 Filing Date: July 14, 2016

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________ 3 Filing Date: July 14, 2016

DocID: 1rs4X - View Document

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE Post Office Box 7482 Charlottesville, VirginiaJOHN W. WHITEHEAD Founder and President TELEPHONE

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE Post Office Box 7482 Charlottesville, VirginiaJOHN W. WHITEHEAD Founder and President TELEPHONE

DocID: 1qY7o - View Document

Infographic for Immediate Release March 18, 2016 Court 101: Understanding the criminal case process HARRISBURG—A criminal charge alleges that a violation of the criminal law – an offense against the community – has

Infographic for Immediate Release March 18, 2016 Court 101: Understanding the criminal case process HARRISBURG—A criminal charge alleges that a violation of the criminal law – an offense against the community – has

DocID: 1qX12 - View Document

Microsoft Word - Ley de Extinsion de Dominio Mexico - English

Microsoft Word - Ley de Extinsion de Dominio Mexico - English

DocID: 1qKdk - View Document

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA MAY 7, 2015 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Rule 21.1 and Rule 26.1, Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure, be amended to read in accordance with Appendices A and B, respectively, to this order;

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA MAY 7, 2015 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Rule 21.1 and Rule 26.1, Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure, be amended to read in accordance with Appendices A and B, respectively, to this order;

DocID: 1qJwj - View Document