Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Law / Textualism / Statutory interpretation / Antonin Scalia / Bond v. United States / Law of the United States / Clarence Thomas / Conservatism in the United States / Statutory law / Conservatism in North America


Bond v. United States: Concurring in the Judgment Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz* Introduction When Mr. Bond first impregnated Mrs. Bond’s best friend, the international Chemical Weapons Convention was probably the furthest
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-09-16 12:51:41


Open Document

File Size: 264,26 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Norristown / /

Country

Netherlands / Zimbabwe / United States / /

Event

Judicial Event / /

Facility

Cato Institute / Supreme Court / Georgetown Law Library / University Law Center / Amici Curiae Cato Institute / /

IndustryTerm

chemical weapon / chosen chemicals / complicated and fuzzy algorithm / chemical warfare / law assault / pharmaceutical activity / foreign relations law / local chemical assault / chemical weapons / toxic chemicals / chemical action / interpretive tools / judicial search / chemical / chemicals / toxic chemical / /

Organization

House of Representatives / SUPREME COURT / Harvard / Cato Institute / Georgetown University Law Center / Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence / Amici Curiae Cato Institute / Senate / Atlantic Legal Foundation / Congress / State Police / U.S. Court of Appeals / UN Court / Obama administration / /

Person

Antonin Scalia / Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz / Stacey L. Bennett / Stephanie Freudenberg / Oliver Wendell Holmes / John Roberts / Bush / Nita A. Farahany / Bond / Samuel Alito / Clarence Thomas / Vladimir Putin / /

Position

Chief Justice / president / Professor of law / commentator / assistant United States attorney / Chief / /

Product

Webster / /

ProvinceOrState

Michigan / Missouri / Escambia County / Pennsylvania / /

PublishedMedium

the Harvard Law Review / /

Technology

complicated and fuzzy algorithm / /

URL

http /

SocialTag