medical marijuana law / retail price / beverage purposes / prosthetic devices / retail / tax-free product / retail marijuana prices / secondary product / finance / parallel systems / processed products / taxed retail price / federal law / systems / particular products / home-grown products / tax-paid product / law enforcement / retail prices / hospital services / means-tested food stamps / /
Organization
Washington Liquor Control Board / National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws / Internal Revenue Service / Colorado Legislative Council / National Board of Legal Specialty Certification / Vermont Legislative Joint Fiscal Office / Vermont Legislature / Medicare / social security administration / Food and Nutrition Service / U.S. Department of Agriculture / Legislative Analyst’s Office / Department of Health / Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau / /
Person
Keith Stroup / Dale Gieringer / Jeanne Kohl-Welles / Timothy Shaw / Daniel Okrent / Rick Garza / Katherine Pfrommer / Mark A.R. Kleiman / Beau Kilmer / Megan Gambino / Ann Rivers / Jacob Pruess / Angela Hawken / Pete Holmes / Kari Boiter / Rocco Pendola / John Hudak / John Ingold / Kristen Wyatt / Ian Lovett / Evan Bush / Erin Mansfield / Trevor Hughes / Gene Johnson / / /
Supplemental Thoughts about Revenue from Marijuana in Vermont Pat Oglesby, January 16, 2015 Background and Scope “Considering Marijuana Legalization: Insights for Vermont and Other Jurisdictions,”1 a RAND Corporation