<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Politics of the United States / Disparate treatment / Oregon v. Mitchell / Discrimination / South Carolina v. Katzenbach / Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder / Rogers v. Lodge / Law / Case law / Voting Rights Act
Date: 2013-08-08 20:32:45
Politics of the United States
Disparate treatment
Oregon v. Mitchell
Discrimination
South Carolina v. Katzenbach
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder
Rogers v. Lodge
Law
Case law
Voting Rights Act

Microsoft Word - Franken QFRs for Levitt.docx

Add to Reading List

Source URL: redistricting.lls.edu

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 58,42 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Collective outline for day 34: April 25, 2016 Congressional Enforcement of Civil Rights. Case: Katzenbach v. Morgan Facts and Procedural History: Registered voters in the state of New York challenged the constitutionalit

Collective outline for day 34: April 25, 2016 Congressional Enforcement of Civil Rights. Case: Katzenbach v. Morgan Facts and Procedural History: Registered voters in the state of New York challenged the constitutionalit

DocID: 1pSUc - View Document

Microsoft Word - _1_Karlan.doc

Microsoft Word - _1_Karlan.doc

DocID: RKCe - View Document

Microsoft Word - _5_Bryant

Microsoft Word - _5_Bryant

DocID: REDl - View Document

No[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA, Petitioner,

No[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA, Petitioner,

DocID: Q5kL - View Document

Microsoft Word - Franken QFRs for Levitt.docx

Microsoft Word - Franken QFRs for Levitt.docx

DocID: NH7W - View Document