Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Private law / Attractive nuisance doctrine / Licensee / Trespasser / Trespass / Nuisance / Tort / Negligence / Outline of tort law / Law / Tort law / Common law


[Cite as Bennett v. Stanley, 92 Ohio St.3d 35, 2001-OhioBENNETT, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. STANLEY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Bennett v. Stanley (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 35.] Torts — Negligence — Attractive nuisance
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2004-07-02 05:56:43


Open Document

File Size: 62,71 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Columbus / Cleveland / Washington / Sioux City / /

Company

S. Hill Mfg. / Hartz & Restle Realtors Inc. / /

Country

United States / /

Event

Product Issues / Person Communication and Meetings / /

Facility

Court of Appeals / /

IndustryTerm

hazardous machinery / tort law / /

NaturalFeature

Lake Erie RR / /

Organization

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Thus / SUPREME COURT OF OHIO / Elliott court / Court of Appeals / UN Court / Wills court / Ohio Univ. / /

Person

STANLEY ET AL / Cher D. Bennett / Cher Bennett / Chance Lattea / Jeffrey Stanley / Kyleigh / Stacey Stanley / Kyleigh D. Bennett / Marion Elec / Rickey G. Bennett / /

Position

Administrator / sheriff / /

Product

machinery / /

ProvinceOrState

Washington County / Ohio / Utah / Virginia / Maryland / Delaware / /

SocialTag