Randgold / Hlazo 2010 (4) SA / Drotsky 2002 (4) SA / Marais 2009 (6) SA / Randcoal Services Ltd / Telkom SA Ltd / Exploration Co Ltd / Kovas Investments / Poulter 1983 (4) SA / CC 2000 (1) SA / SH 2011 (3) SA / Standard Bank of SA Ltd / Tanus Chemical Manufacturing Co / Hilsage Investments / Van der Merwe 1980 (3) SA / Cooper Bezuidenhout Incorporated / Eerste Nasionale Bank / Ltd 1974 (3) SA / Montesse Township & Investment Corporation / ABSA Bank Ltd / Ltd 1975 (3) SA / Dannecker 2001 (1) SA / Maree 1981 (4) SA / Industrial Development Corporation / Ellis 1984 (4) SA / Du Preez 1981 (3) SA / Minnaar 1954 (3) SA / /
Country
South Africa / /
Facility
High Court / University of Cape Town / /
IndustryTerm
doctrinal devices / family law context / law freedom / contract law / fundamental law / doctrinal tools / appropriate tool / /
Organization
Department of Public Law / High Court of South Africa / UN Court / Supreme Court / Cape Provisional Division / University of Cape Town / Appellate Division / /
Person
Van As / Ellison Kahn / Dale Hutchison / Louise Tager / Karee Kloof Melkery / Stuart Woolman / D. Emphasis / Jonathan Lewis / Van Huyssteen / Gerhard Lubbe / /
Position
Attorney / Professor / Contract General / Judge / /
ESCAPING THE ‘SHIFREN SHACKLE’ THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF THREE RECENT CASES SHOWS SHIFREN IS NOT SO IMMUTABLE AFTER ALL* Lauren Kohn† Lecturer in the Department of Public Law, Univers