Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Methodology / Impact assessment / Development / Research / ALNAP / Program evaluation / Participatory evaluation / Participation / Participatory rural appraisal / Evaluation / Evaluation methods / Science


ALNAP Discussion Series Improving the quality of EHA evidence Method Note 3 October 2014
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-11-10 09:46:38

Open Document

File Size: 146,83 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Geneva / Calverton / Bangui / Addis Ababa / Lira / London / Baltimore / Somerville / New York / /

Company

Princeton University Press / Guildford Press / Practical Action Publishing / Earthscan Publications Ltd. / /

Country

Kenya / Uganda / Central African Republic / United Kingdom / /

Facility

Tufts University / Institute of Development Studies / /

IndustryTerm

household food / participatory and reflective practice tools / participatory tools / communication technology / participatory evaluation tools / minimum food needs / minimum food income / geospatial information technologies / improved household food security / food / /

Organization

Feinstein International Center / Catholic Relief Service / OCHA Country Office / MSF / US Federal Reserve / Institute of Development Studies / United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund / UNICEF Evaluation Office / Princeton University / Community of Practice / IFRC Planning and Evaluation Department / London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine / Save the Children / ALNAP Humanitarian Evaluation Community of Practice / Humanitarian Innovation Fund / Tufts University / /

Person

Donini Clarke / Jeremy Holland / Jessica Alexander / Knox Clarke / Francesca Bonino / Foley / Robert Chambers / /

Position

external evaluator / King / farmer / manager / evaluator / judge how well programming / /

ProvinceOrState

Kosovo / /

PublishedMedium

The CRS Guide / /

Technology

communication technology / geospatial information technologies / /

SocialTag