Eli Lilly / Chicago Tribune / Johnson and Johnson / Amgen / Conexant / Google / EPO / Genentech / Editors / Dole / Texas Instruments / Xerox Corporation / Globespan Virata / Schering Plough / United Airlines / Thomas Edison / /
Country
United States / India / /
Currency
USD / / /
Event
Legal Issues / Bankruptcy / /
Facility
University Environment / Carnegie Mellon University / Stanford University / University of California / Battelle Memorial Institute / /
IndustryTerm
contingent-fee law / fiber-optic devices / treatment of diabetes / machinery or other equipment / satellite television receivers / manufacturing / law firms / law / /
Organization
MIT / American Corporate Counsel Association / Stanford’s office of Technology Licensing / Board of Editors of Patent Strategy & Management / Patent Office / Congress / Stanford University / Carnegie Mellon University / Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus / University of California at San Francisco / /
Person
Solomon Linda / David Mowery / Chester Carlson / Wilbur Wright / Herbert Shaw / Pete Seeger / Orville / JOSEPH N. HOSTENY / Frederick Cottrell / George Westinghouse / Roland Vogl / / /
Position
Assistant US Attorney / NIRO Regular IP Today columnist / lead lawyer / Corporate Counsel / intellectual property litigation attorney / professor / Director / worker / Registered Professional Engineer / Berkeley professor / Lawyer / /
ProvinceOrState
California / /
PublishedMedium
The Chicago Tribune / /
SportsLeague
Stanford University / /
Technology
cloning / DSL / recombinant DNA / satellite television / dialysis / /
LITIGATORS CORNER: Stanford University – A Patent Troll? In my February, 2006 column, Patent