Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Doctrine of equivalents / Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. / Prosecution history estoppel / Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. / Warner-Jenkinson Company /  Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. / Patent infringement / Claim / Estoppel / Prosecution disclaimer / Law / Patent law / Civil law


Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 17, Number 1 Fall 2003 THE JUDICIAL DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS Darcy August Paul*
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2011-02-11 21:40:35


Open Document

File Size: 283,46 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Washington / /

Company

Festo Corp. / See Unique Concepts Inc. / Linde Air Products Co. / Chrysler Corp. / Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. / Warner-Jenkinson Co. / See Festo Corp. / Machine Co. / McCormick / Sanitary Refrigerator Co. / /

Country

United States / /

/

Event

Legal Issues / /

Facility

Circuit Court / Supreme Court / Harvard College / /

IndustryTerm

railway car / transportation / paper bagmaking device / rail car / patent law mark / nail-making device / case law / accused infringing device / statutory patent law requirements / patent law / /

Organization

Harvard Law School / Winans Court / District Court / Supreme Court / Harvard / Murphy court / Patent Administration / Harvard College / U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts / Congress / Circuit Court of Pennsylvania / UN Court / US Federal Reserve / Graver Tank Court / /

Person

Tong Zou / Glen P. Belvis / William F. Lee / Christopher Woo / Ross Winans / Talbot Denmead / Davis Chem / Darcy August Paul / Donald S. Chisum / Edward / R. Polk Wagner / Adam / /

Position

General / author / faculty advisor / Professor / counsel for Winans / faculty advisor / /

ProvinceOrState

A.B. / Pennsylvania / Massachusetts / /

SocialTag