Evanston / Washington / DC / Amsterdam / Toronto / Glasgow / London / /
Company
New York University Law Review / Technical Working Group / Cambridge University Press / Clarendon Press / The Times / Oxford University Press / Vathek Publishing / INTLJEVIDENCEPROOF 104 / Northwestern University Press / Basil Blackwell Ltd / Stanford University Press / /
G. Pike / US National Institute of Justice / D. Hall / National Institute of Justice / /
IndustryTerm
law jurisdiction / information processing / police car / law lies / day-to-day law enforcement / rhetorical device / /
Movie
Law and Order / /
MusicGroup
Annex / /
Organization
Runciman Commission on Criminal Justice / Cambridge University / Royal Commission on Criminal Justice / New York University / Northwestern University / Police Leadership and Powers Unit / National Institute of Justice / office of Justice Programs / US Department of Justice / Policing and Reducing Crime Unit / Office/Cabinet Office / UN Court / Cabinet Office / Stanford University / American Psychology Law Society / Home Office / Court of Appeal / Oxford University / /
Person
Ian McKenzie / Andrew Roberts / Rethinking Evidence / Diane Birch / David Ormerod / /
Forbes / the Review / Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin / Law and Human Behavior / The Times / The Joint Review / Journal of Personality and Social Psychology / Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology / /
International Journal of Evidence & Proof 2004 The problem of mistaken identification: some observations on process Andrew Roberts Subject: Criminal evidence. Other related subjects: Criminal procedure Keywords: Criminal