energy efficiency programme / transport improvements and infrastructure / insurance / human rights law / energy price freeze / higher education finance / retail banking sector / Public services / public investment bank / drugs law / energy prices / sustainable food production / market-shaping energy efficiency standards / food / energy / greenhouse gas emissions / energy market / energy tariffs / insurance threshold / electricity generation / smart card ticketing systems / local public services / mental health services / transient product / security services / green technologies / school food standards / insurance thresholds / bus travel / cheaper supplier / energy sector / gas stations / community energy / /
Conservative Party / Natural Capital Committee / Business Growth Fund / Andrew Harrop Stephen Lee Chapter / Foreign Office / Labour Party / Royal College of Teachers / All government / Labour government / Low Pay Commission / Make Parliament / Encourage police / Communities and Local Government / Committee on Climate Change Implement / Liberal Democrat / House of Lords / Sports Ground Safety Authority / Teacher Board / Pay Commission / Fabian Society / Department of Communities / Home Office / National Institute for Crime Prevention / European Union / Liberal Democrats / Department of Health / NHS / Educational Standards Authority / Regulation Advisory Board / House of Commons / /
Person
Andrew Harrop / Stephen Lee / Andrew Harrop Stephen Lee / /
Common ground? An analysis of the Liberal Democrat and Labour programmes Andrew Harrop Stephen Lee