Melbourne University Law Review / HCA / Native Title Representative Bodies / Wilson / Hart Publishing / /
Country
Canada / Australia / United Kingdom / /
Facility
High Court / Murdoch University / /
Holiday
Commonwealth Day / Commonwealth Day of Australia / /
IndustryTerm
claimant / law principles / law-making system / case law rules / land law / comparative law / law courts / law doctrines / identifiable / statutory reflection / claim / title law / case law / law relating / law system / law evolution / /
Organization
Law Society / Kimberley Land Council / High Court / Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples / National Native Title Tribunal / Parliament of Australia / Australian Law Reform Commission / Australian Human Rights Commission / Western Australian Government / Association of Mining and Exploration Companies / Cape York Land Council / Senate / Pastoralists and Graziers Association / UN Court / Murdoch University / Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community / Northern Territory Government / National Farmers’ Federation / /
Person
Patrick Dodson / Robert French / Torres Strait Islanders / Ulla Secher / Richard Eccles / Francis Bennion / Aboriginal Strait / Torres Strait / Paul Burke / Michael Hudson McHugh / Alex Reilly / Christopher Evans / Mark Leibler / Tim Goodwin / Tanya Hosch / Torres Strait Islander / John Anderson / / /
Position
Minister / Commissioner / Marshall / /
ProvinceOrState
Western Australia / Queensland / Northern Territory / /
2. Framework for Review of the Native Title Act Contents Framework for the proposals Rationale for reform Australia’s legal history The basis of native title law