Henderson v. City of Columbus: The Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies “Intent” or “Foreseeability” Required For Inverse Condemnation David Bargen, Esq.

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-10-07 11:52:44 Law Tort law Common law Criminal law Elements of crime Philosophy of law Inverse condemnation Proximate cause Causation Negligence Strict liability Court of appeals		Henderson v. City of Columbus: The Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies “Intent” or “Foreseeability” Required For Inverse Condemnation David Bargen, Esq. Add to Reading List Source URL: watercenter.unl.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 152,86 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Defeasible Reasoning, Special Pleading and the Cosmological Argument April 13, 2008 Abstract The rehabilitation of causation and modal realism in recent analytic philosophy have made possible the revival of the argument DocID: 1vs09 - View Document
	Alan McKay The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern Ireland Constitution, Mechanism, and Downward Causation DocID: 1vr6T - View Document
	10 Faith and Philosophy Peter van Inwagen’s essay, “Causation and the Mental,” offers a striking solution to Jaegwon Kim’s puzzle for non-reductive materialists about mental events/states and mental causation: t DocID: 1vfvd - View Document
	A model-based theory of omissive causation Paul F. Bello and Sangeet S. Khemlani {paul.bello, sangeet.khemlani}@nrl.navy.mil U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DCUSA Abstract DocID: 1v2yt - View Document
	Quantum mechanics and consciousness: Thoughts on a causal correspondence theory Ian J. Thompson Abstract Which way does causation proceed? The pattern in the material DocID: 1uUQZ - View Document