NADOHE STATEMENT Chief Diversity Officers: Leading and Engaging in Campus Deliberations on Post-Fisher Admissions Strategies Executive Summary 1. Our intent in this document is to provide NADOHE members with practical in

First Page		Document Content
University and college admissions University of Texas at Austin Social inequality Fisher v. University of Texas Grutter v. Bollinger Discrimination Affirmative action Affirmative action in the United States Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1		NADOHE STATEMENT Chief Diversity Officers: Leading and Engaging in Campus Deliberations on Post-Fisher Admissions Strategies Executive Summary 1. Our intent in this document is to provide NADOHE members with practical in Add to Reading List Source URL: www.nadohe.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 53,59 KB Share Document on Facebook

	November 19, 2015 U. S. Commission on Civil Rights Issues Statement in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Supporting the University’s Admissions Policy as a Compelling Governmental Interest and Narrowly Tailored DocID: 1qJcv - View Document
	NADOHE STATEMENT Chief Diversity Officers: Leading and Engaging in Campus Deliberations on Post-Fisher Admissions Strategies Executive Summary 1. Our intent in this document is to provide NADOHE members with practical in DocID: 1pmKF - View Document
	Race-Neutral Strategies An Issue Brief from the Access & Diversity Collaborative JanuaryAbout this Issue Brief DocID: 14Qn5 - View Document
	11256_2007_73_40_1-web[removed] DocID: Za4W - View Document
	REFLECTIONS ON RICHARD SANDER’S CLASS IN AMERICAN LEGAL EDUCATION RICHARD D. KAHLENBERG† Low-income students of all races have been the invisible men and women of American legal education. But in the nonfiction realm DocID: S5fF - View Document