Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Electric power / Hydro-Québec / Churchill Falls / Crown corporations of Canada / Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited / Nalcor Energy / Lower Churchill Project / Haida Nation v. British Columbia / Environmental impact assessment / Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro / Hydroelectricity in Canada / Energy


PU[removed]Reasons for Decision
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2010-03-17 14:25:09


Open Document

File Size: 1,13 MB

Share Result on Facebook

Company

45 Attorney General ofNewfoundland / Public Utilities / Hydro-Quebec / Conseil des Innus / CF(L)Co. / Twin Falls Power Corporation Limited / 35 Ekuanitshit / Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited. / Enbridge Pipelines Inc. / Labrador Hydro / Nalcor Energy / Commissioners of Public Utilities / LL.B. / /

Country

Canada / Columbia / United Kingdom / /

Event

Business Partnership / Force Majeure / /

Facility

The Supreme Court / Supreme Court of Canada / Supreme Court / /

IndustryTerm

case law / affected supplier / /

NaturalFeature

Churchill River / Energy waterfall / /

Organization

Supreme Court / Utilities Commission / Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities / Department of Justice / UN Court / zZ Labrador BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES REASONS FOR DECISION / Carrier Sekani Tribal Council / /

Person

Mani-Utenam Innu / Dwanda Newman / David Schulze / Andy Wells / Ian F. Kelly / Darlene Whalen / Jamie Smith / Gary Carot / /

Position

counsel / Minister / Chair and Chief Executive Officer / producer / Vice-Chair / Commissioner / Attorney General / /

ProvinceOrState

Q.C. / Newfoundland / British Columbia / /

SocialTag