Belarus / Germany / Netherlands / Italy / New Zealand / Kazakstan / Belgium / Turkey / France / Russia / United States / Australia / United Kingdom / China / Iraq / Ukraine / Greece / /
IndustryTerm
humanitarian law / chemical and biological attacks / non-use protocol / nuclear explosive devices / chemical attack / chemical weapon use / nuclear device / explosive devices / law defining war crimes / law binding / customary international law / humanitarian law protecting combatants / chemical and biological weapons / /
Organization
International Court of Justice / Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty John Burroughs Lawyers' Committee on Nuclear Policy New York / Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council / Centre for European Security and Disarmament / International Atomic Energy Agency / Strategic Forces Subcommittee / Senate Armed Services Committee / North Atlantic Treaty Organization / United States Senate / Congress / State party / White House / Permanent Joint Council / British American Security Information Council / Security Council / Armed Services Committee / Air Force / International Criminal Court / Austrian Study Center for Peace and Conflict Research / /
Person
Clinton / Perry / Nicola Butler / Georg Schofbanker / Edward Warner III / Dan Plesch / Washington Summit Communique / Martin Butcher / Earle G. Wheeler / Robert Bell / George Bunn / Oliver Meir / /
Position
president / General / Secretary / chairman / Assistant Secretary of Defense / special assistant / president for national security / Butler / Butcher / /
PublishedMedium
The Nonproliferation Review / Washington Post / the Washington Post / /
TWO LEGAL ISSUES CONFRONTING NATO AND THE NON-PROLIFERATION REGIME: US Presidential Decision Directive 60 versus Pledges of Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons