DEFENDING DOUBLE EFFECT Ralph Wedgwood Abstract This essay defends a version of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) – that is, the doctrine that there is normally a stronger reason against an act that has a bad state o - Principle of double effect - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	DEFENDING DOUBLE EFFECT Ralph Wedgwood Abstract This essay defends a version of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) – that is, the doctrine that there is normally a stronger reason against an act that has a bad state o Add to Reading List Document Date: 2011-03-01 05:04:22 Open Document File Size: 221,18 KB Share Result on Facebook City Toronto / Oxford / / Company Leverhulme Trust / / Continent North America / / Country Mexico / United States / / Facility Trinity College / Somerville College / Australian National University / University of Toronto / / Organization Trinity College Dublin / Blue government / Somerville College / Australian National University / University of Toronto / / Person Thomas Aquinas / Thomas Nagel / Frank Jackson / Jeff McMahan / Douglas Husak / Alison MacIntyre / Warren Quinn / Philippa Foot / Alvin Goldman / Judith Thomson / / Position spy / judge / / SocialTag Philosophy Bioethics Principle of double effect Thomism Ceteris paribus Consequentialism Deontological ethics Ethics Meta-ethics Normative ethics

DEFENDING DOUBLE EFFECT Ralph Wedgwood Abstract This essay defends a version of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) – that is, the doctrine that there is normally a stronger reason against an act that has a bad state oAdd to Reading List