Kansas Supreme Court[removed] – State v. Marshall - Prosecutorial misconduct - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2012-07-27 11:09:18 Eyewitness identification Prosecutorial misconduct Closing argument Witness Trial Law Legal procedure Appeal		Kansas Supreme Court[removed] – State v. Marshall Add to Reading List Source URL: www.kscourts.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 136,19 KB Share Document on Facebook

	STATE v. HENDERSON: A MODEL FOR ADMITTING EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION TESTIMONY AMY D. TRENARY* Eyewitness identification testimony is notoriously unreliable and has significantly contributed to wrongful convictions. DocID: 1uOtk - View Document
	THE RELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE 1 Initial Eyewitness Confidence Reliably Predicts Eyewitness Identification Accuracy DocID: 1sG1a - View Document
	QUESTIONNAIRE When completing this Questionnaire bear in mind that we focus on cases of factual innocence. It is assumed that this form is being completed by the individual seeking EXI’s assistance. If filled out by an DocID: 1pJFL - View Document
	Psychology, Crime & Law ISSN: 1068-316X (PrintOnline) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gpcl20 The effect of choice reversals on blindness for identification decisions DocID: 1puxA - View Document
	PDF Document DocID: 1oWfe - View Document