<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Judicial remedies / Tort law / Quantum meruit / Contract / Quasi-contract / Damages / Measure of damages under English law / Unjust enrichment / Negligence / Law / Contract law / Restitution
Date: 2007-07-30 11:27:58
Judicial remedies
Tort law
Quantum meruit
Contract
Quasi-contract
Damages
Measure of damages under English law
Unjust enrichment
Negligence
Law
Contract law
Restitution

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or

Add to Reading List

Source URL: jud.ct.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 89,42 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Fraud and Equity By Amy Sara Cores, Esq. Rule 4:50-1 provides that upon motion with briefs the court may relieve a party from a final judgment or order on the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of a

Fraud and Equity By Amy Sara Cores, Esq. Rule 4:50-1 provides that upon motion with briefs the court may relieve a party from a final judgment or order on the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of a

DocID: 1pqZo - View Document

(SAL Ann Rev  Building and Construction Law 82

(SAL Ann Rev Building and Construction Law 82

DocID: 1aFv8 - View Document

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSS BUEHLER FALK & COMPANY, LLP VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSS BUEHLER FALK & COMPANY, LLP VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE

DocID: 19EU9 - View Document

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVNA KNEPPER ASSOCIATES, INC. VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVNA KNEPPER ASSOCIATES, INC. VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

DocID: 19ukP - View Document

REVERSE and REMAND; Opinion Filed September 22, S In The  Court of Appeals

REVERSE and REMAND; Opinion Filed September 22, S In The Court of Appeals

DocID: 198hM - View Document