EPSRC Peer Review Survey 1) What three aspects of EPSRC Peer Review should be changed? a. Need route to cross-calibrating referees reports. b. Need framework to control application demand so that success rates can be mai - Rates in the United Kingdom - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	EPSRC Peer Review Survey 1) What three aspects of EPSRC Peer Review should be changed? a. Need route to cross-calibrating referees reports. b. Need framework to control application demand so that success rates can be mai Add to Reading List Document Date: 2014-04-25 09:28:19 Open Document File Size: 28,75 KB Share Result on Facebook Company Peer Review / IOP Publishing / / Country United States / United Kingdom / / / Facility Institute of Physics / / / Organization Institute of Physics / National Science Foundation / College of Referees / Registered Charity / / / Position General / leader in scientific publishing / / PublishedMedium Physical Review Letters / Peer Review / / URL www.iop.org / / SocialTag Academic publishing Academic literature Scientific method Peer review Science and technology in the United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council UK Research Councils Grant Science Knowledge

EPSRC Peer Review Survey 1) What three aspects of EPSRC Peer Review should be changed? a. Need route to cross-calibrating referees reports. b. Need framework to control application demand so that success rates can be maiAdd to Reading List