<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Supreme court / European Court of Human Rights / Supreme Court of Finland / European Court of Justice / Supreme Court of the Czech Republic / Supreme Court of Ireland / Persuasive precedent / Judge / Ratio decidendi / Law / Government / Politics
Date: 2013-11-29 03:32:47
Supreme court
European Court of Human Rights
Supreme Court of Finland
European Court of Justice
Supreme Court of the Czech Republic
Supreme Court of Ireland
Persuasive precedent
Judge
Ratio decidendi
Law
Government
Politics

REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Identification of the participant Name: RUMANA (Mr)

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.aca-europe.eu

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 300,20 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM  UKSCREFERENCE BY THE COURT OF APPEAL (NORTHERN IRELAND) – IN THE MATTER OF AN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM UKSCREFERENCE BY THE COURT OF APPEAL (NORTHERN IRELAND) – IN THE MATTER OF AN

DocID: 1tAZL - View Document

Pageof 100 DOCUMENTS Copyright (cTrustees of the University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law May, 2001

Pageof 100 DOCUMENTS Copyright (cTrustees of the University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law May, 2001

DocID: 1pBhO - View Document

„Facebook Class Action“: Appeals Court allowed „Model Case“ Admissibility of “Class Action” will be decided by the Austrian Supreme Court The Austrian “class action” against Facebook Ireland Ltd (Facebook

„Facebook Class Action“: Appeals Court allowed „Model Case“ Admissibility of “Class Action” will be decided by the Austrian Supreme Court The Austrian “class action” against Facebook Ireland Ltd (Facebook

DocID: 1mcNh - View Document

Page 1  Biotronik A.G., Appellant-Respondent, v Conor Medsystems Ireland, Ltd., et al., Respondents-Appellants, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST

Page 1 Biotronik A.G., Appellant-Respondent, v Conor Medsystems Ireland, Ltd., et al., Respondents-Appellants, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST

DocID: 1m2jg - View Document

Update on early retirement, Retirement Plan 2 and Plan 3 members who are between 55 and 64 years old who have 30 years of service currently have the option to retire with a reduced penalty to their retirement ben

Update on early retirement, Retirement Plan 2 and Plan 3 members who are between 55 and 64 years old who have 30 years of service currently have the option to retire with a reduced penalty to their retirement ben

DocID: 1gxEm - View Document