<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States federal law / Relevant conduct / Sentence / English criminal law / Elements of crime / Delict / United States federal probation and supervised release / United States v. Booker / Law / Criminal law / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Date: 2014-01-08 18:20:10
United States federal law
Relevant conduct
Sentence
English criminal law
Elements of crime
Delict
United States federal probation and supervised release
United States v. Booker
Law
Criminal law
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Microsoft PowerPoint - RelCon-NewOrleans2009-May18-2009(NoExtras).ppt [Compatibility Mode]

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ussc.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 88,02 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

DocID: 1u8YR - View Document

Case: Document: Page: 1

Case: Document: Page: 1

DocID: 1pL6K - View Document

JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the

JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the

DocID: 1os0A - View Document

Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW

Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW

DocID: 1my60 - View Document

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH

DocID: 1ll9b - View Document