IBM / Cisco Systems / Frisbee / Symantec / Intel / Microsoft / / /
Event
FDA Phase / /
Facility
University of Utah / Computing University / /
IndustryTerm
applicationlevel reliable multicast protocol / Receiver vs. sender-driven protocol / file-level tool / bulk disk imaging / disk imaging systems / lossy networks / Disk imaging / classic hardware / transport protocol / imaging / installation tool / disk imaging solution work / multicast protocols / multicast loss recovery algorithm / error recovery protocol / image creation tool / switch technologies / receiver-driven reliable multicast protocol / filesystem-aware compression tool / secure high-bandwidth local network / disk imaging system / typical unicast protocols / disk imaging tool / multicast protocol / image distribution protocol / client-driven protocol / computing / typical file compression tools / server-driven protocol / imagezip bee protocol / image creator / file-based synchronization tools / delay-bandwidth product / disk installation tool / substantial computing / /
OperatingSystem
Unix / XP / Linux / FreeBSD / Unix system / DOS / BSD / Microsoft Windows / /
Organization
National Science Foundation / University of Utah / Salt Lake City / Frisbee Mike Hibler Leigh Stoller Jay Lepreau Robert Ricci Chad Barb School / School of Computing / Computing University of Utah Abstract Both / /
Position
Author / writer / disk writer / /
Product
Windows XP / NAK-avoidance / /
ProvinceOrState
Utah / Manitoba / /
Technology
LAN / RAM / imagezip bee protocol / Unix / Linux / client-driven protocol / server-driven protocol / multicast protocol / switch technologies / MTU / operating system / UDP / image distribution protocol / SSL / operating systems / existing multicast protocols / encryption / Ethernet / error recovery protocol / transport protocol / Unix system / multicast loss recovery algorithm / then typical unicast protocols / VLAN technology / caching / virtual LAN / Receiver vs. sender-driven protocol / /