(,121 ,1( Citation: 2003 Sup. Ct. Rev[removed]Content downloaded printed from HeinOnline (http: heinonline.org) Mon Feb 7 13:21:[removed]Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance - Roberts Court - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2011-02-07 14:50:14 History of the United States Regents of the University of California v. Bakke University of California Grutter v. Bollinger Discrimination Equal Protection Clause Lewis F. Powell Jr. Affirmative action Gratz v. Bollinger Law Case law Social inequality		+(,121/,1( Citation: 2003 Sup. Ct. Rev[removed]Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Mon Feb 7 13:21:[removed]Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.virginia.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 1,36 MB Share Document on Facebook

	NoIn The Supreme Court of the United States ____________ DocID: 1rp4y - View Document
	November 19, 2015 U. S. Commission on Civil Rights Issues Statement in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Supporting the University’s Admissions Policy as a Compelling Governmental Interest and Narrowly Tailored DocID: 1qJcv - View Document
	July 20, 2016 The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Applauds the U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decision Upholding the University of Texas’ Affirmative Action Admissions Policy The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights applauds DocID: 1qCAA - View Document
	Was Justice O’Connor Right? Race and Highly Selective College Admissions in 25 Years1 Alan B. Krueger, Jesse Rothstein, and Sarah Turner In her opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor concluded t DocID: 1qrjI - View Document
	Microsoft Word - 5222287_7.DOCX DocID: 1qcyc - View Document