Germany / Netherlands / Italy / Sweden / Norway / France / Bosnia and Herzegovina / Russia / Austria / United Kingdom / Ireland / /
Currency
EUR / /
Facility
University of Strasbourg / /
IndustryTerm
normal domestic law process / case law / case-law / judicial systems / /
Organization
Court on Draft Protocol / Court of Justice / Steering Committee for Human Rights / Court on the Draft Protocol / University of Strasbourg in France / Committee of Ministers / European Court / Court on Draft Protocol N°16 / Contracting Party / Strasbourg court / United Nations / Treaty Office / Plenary Court / European Union / European Court of Human Rights / Council of Europe / /
Person
Christos Giannopoulos / Ami Barav / GEORGES VANDERSANDEN / Paul Gragl / Christos L. Giannopoulos / Marie-Clotilde Runavot / MOHAMMAD ALJAGHOUB / Constance Grewe / Denys Simon / Jean-Paul Jacqué / JEAN CLAUDE GAUTRON / Sarah Lambrecht / Francoise Benoit-Rohmer / /
Position
Minister of Health / Secretary General / author / Professor / Commissioner / authentic interpreter / involved judge / referring judge / judge / national judge / /
Developments Considerations on Protocol N°16: Can the New Advisory Competence of the European Court of Human Rights Breathe New Life into the European Convention on Human Rights? By Christos Giannopoulos*