N.Y. Times Co. / Am. Mini Theatres Inc. / Staples / New York Times Co. / Open Communication / COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW / Pearson / U.S. Gypsum Co. / Free / Time Inc. / Hustler Magazine Inc. / Robert Welch Inc. / Belknap Press / /
Country
United States / /
Event
Judicial Event / /
Facility
University of Virginia School / Supreme Court / In Garrison / /
IndustryTerm
criminal-law principles / law reaches / case law / constitutional law / criminal law / /
Movie
Clear and Present Danger / /
NaturalFeature
Arlington Heights / /
Organization
Supreme Court / Hebrew University Law Faculty / Cornell / UCLA School of Law / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / Congress / Communist Party / University of Virginia School of Law / Yale Law School / /
Person
Fred Schauer / Seana Valentine Shiffrin / Jacob Abrams / Kim Ferzan / Alon Harel / Young v / Joanna Schwartz / Martin H. Redish / Frederick Schauer / Elena Kagan / Micah Schwartzman / Charles Schenck / Edward J. Bloustein / David A. Strauss / Leslie Kendrick / David M. Rabban / Laurence H. Tribe / Stephen Munzer / G. Edward White / Geoffrey R. Stone / Kent Greenawalt / Oliver Wendell Holmes / Jr. / Barbara Spellman / Ken Abraham / Robert Goldstein / Gerald Gunther / Mary L. Rev / Seana Shiffrin / John Hart Ely / Mark Greenberg / Vince Blasi / Larry Alexander / / /
Position
actor / Professor of Law / speaker / Elucidating speaker / critic / given speaker / If speaker / arguing speaker / author / government actor / C. Speaker / never thoroughly considered speaker / /
ProvinceOrState
Kansas / Ohio / Virginia / Illinois / Louisiana / Oregon / New York / California / Arizona / New Hampshire / /
ESSAY FREE SPEECH AND GUILTY MINDS Leslie Kendrick* It is axiomatic that whether speech is protected turns on whether it poses a serious risk of harm—in Holmes’s formulation, a “clear and present danger.” If this