Trinko LLP / Utah Law Review / Verizon Communications / Telkom SA Ltd / University of Chicago Law Review / Senwes Limited / South African Airways Limited / Grinnell Corp. / Oxford University Press / Section 65 85 Section 60 86 Nationwide Airlines / Loyola University Chicago Law Journal / Jacana Publishing / /
Continent
Europe / /
Country
South Africa / Indonesia / United States / / /
Event
Product Issues / Product Recall / /
Facility
University of Johannesburg Centre / King’s College / /
IndustryTerm
competition law interventions / dominance law / online version / competition law intervention / then competition law / energy / case law / communication infrastructure / policy tool / competition law compliance / telecommunications / banking / competition law / /
MarketIndex
case 110 / /
Organization
Law office of Curtis / Supreme Court / Harvard / Centre on Regulation and Competition / King’s College London / Competition Board / Competition Tribunal / Competition Commission / Constitutional Court / Appeal and Constitutional Court / Johannesburg Centre for Competition Economics / Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development / Centre on Regulation / South African Competition Tribunal / Loyola University / Competition Appeal Court / University of Chicago / Department of Trade and Industry / European Union / Oxford University / South African legislature / /
Person
Richard Whish / Simon Roberts / David Lewis / /
Position
Economist / Chief Economist / Manager of the Policy and Research Division / A. General / Governor / supervisor / Professor / supervisor / /
RETHINKING EXCLUSIONARY ABUSE IN SOUTH AFRICA Neil Mackenzie1 Following South Africa’s transition to democracy in 1994, its economy was characterised by concentrated markets, and key industries were dominated by large