<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
European Court of Justice / Contract law / Brussels Regime / Patent law of the European Union / Preliminary ruling / Contractual term / Pammer and Alpenhof cases / Law / European Union law / Conflict of laws
Date: 2014-10-10 08:24:12
European Court of Justice
Contract law
Brussels Regime
Patent law of the European Union
Preliminary ruling
Contractual term
Pammer and Alpenhof cases
Law
European Union law
Conflict of laws

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE FROM 17 OCTOBER 2013 IN CASE CCONSUMER PROTECTION – JURISDICTION IN CROSS-BORDER SALES) On 17 October 2013 the European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) delivered an i

Add to Reading List

Source URL: delchev-lawfirm.com

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 143,04 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE FROM 17 OCTOBER 2013 IN CASE CCONSUMER PROTECTION – JURISDICTION IN CROSS-BORDER SALES) On 17 October 2013 the European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) delivered an i

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE FROM 17 OCTOBER 2013 IN CASE CCONSUMER PROTECTION – JURISDICTION IN CROSS-BORDER SALES) On 17 October 2013 the European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) delivered an i

DocID: 19vOI - View Document

Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I Regulation): with particular focus on the principal changes from the Rome Convention[removed]Doshisha

Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I Regulation): with particular focus on the principal changes from the Rome Convention[removed]Doshisha

DocID: NnTf - View Document

Microsoft Word - I_Contents Hauptheft 4-08.doc

Microsoft Word - I_Contents Hauptheft 4-08.doc

DocID: noij - View Document

[removed]EN Official Journal of the European Communities

[removed]EN Official Journal of the European Communities

DocID: kN8x - View Document

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Trstenjak delivered on 18 May[removed]Case C[removed]Peter Pammer v

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Trstenjak delivered on 18 May[removed]Case C[removed]Peter Pammer v

DocID: dN9D - View Document