Index Relevance Definition (s 55). If irrelevant, inadmissible (s 56). Direct vs Circumstantial evidence (e.g. Smith v R; Plomp; Shepherd). Can also exclude using ss 135-7. - Smith v. United States - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	Index Relevance Definition (s 55). If irrelevant, inadmissible (s 56). Direct vs Circumstantial evidence (e.g. Smith v R; Plomp; Shepherd). Can also exclude using ss 135-7. Add to Reading List Document Date: 2012-06-11 13:58:15 Open Document File Size: 157,62 KB Share Result on Facebook Organization Outside court / / Person Legal Privilege / / Position General / counsel / judge / Hearsay Exceptions General / Queen / Admissions General / Attorney-General / Credibility General / / SocialTag Evidence Relevance Testimony Confession Witness Hearsay in English law Hearsay in United States law Law Evidence law Hearsay

Index Relevance Definition (s 55). If irrelevant, inadmissible (s 56). Direct vs Circumstantial evidence (e.g. Smith v R; Plomp; Shepherd). Can also exclude using ss 135-7.Add to Reading List