Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Competition law / United States v. Microsoft / Microsoft litigation / FTP clients / Tying / Microsoft / Browser wars / United States antitrust law / Netscape Navigator / Software / Computing / Computer law


Decoding Microsoft:
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2009-04-03 14:06:29


Open Document

File Size: 1,08 MB

Share Result on Facebook

City

New York / /

Company

Defendant Microsoft Corporation / Carolina Inc. / Microsoft Corp. / Netscape Communications Corporation / Kodak / Leasco Response Inc. / Show Cause Why Respondent Microsoft Corporation / /

Continent

America / /

Country

Scotland / United States / /

Currency

pence / /

Event

Reorganization / /

Facility

University of North Carolina / Square Pegs / ANNUAL INSTITUTE / Chapel Hill / Second Annual Internet Law Institute / /

IndustryTerm

software engineering / products / browser software / copyright law / away Internet Explorer / Web browser software product / easier-to-use products / software product / system software / possible stand-alone product / basic software / role product / inseparable product / computer manufacturers / serious high technology / nonMicrosoft software code / profitable software platform / extent Internet Explorer / software technologies / Internet Exploration / browser software product competition / Web browser software products / Internet Time / given software product / software markets / browser products / antitrust law / web-browser technology / copyright products / software code / software product market / system software product / software industry / given software / Internet Explorer / /

Movie

Brave New World / /

MusicGroup

Misuse / /

NaturalFeature

Chapel Hill / /

OperatingSystem

Windows 98 / Microsoft Windows / Windows 95 / /

Organization

Antitrust Division / Circuit Court / Court of Appeals / Second Annual Internet Law Institute / CORNELL / University of North Carolina / YALE / Nat’l Bureau of Econ / 22ND ANNUAL INSTITUTE ON COMPUTER LAW / Department of Justice / REHNQUIST COURT / /

Person

Adrienne Davis / Edward W. Felten / MASON L. REV / Jesh Humphrey / Andrew Chin / Dwight R. Lee / William H. Page / DAVID B. KOPEL / James Coates / CHARLES H. FERGUSON / Thomas W. Hazlett / Nat / RICHARD A. SPINELLO / Garrett Dillon / Nicholas Economides / Dennis Karjala / Victoria Slind-Flor / David McGowan / Todd Ito / Jackson / Scott Baker / Richard B. McKenzie / Daniel J. Gifford / Joe Kennedy / Ronald A. Cass / Nathan Brown / Lawrence J. White / Steven Holley / MARY L. REV / Norman Hawker / Letter / Charles Ferguson / Richard L. Schmalensee / Michael L. Katz / Keith N. Hylton / David McIntosh / HERMAN SCHWARTZ / Colleen / STAN J. LIEBOWITZ / Mark Lemley / Robert W. Hahn / Michael Salinger / George Bittlingmayer / Luanne Sacks / Thomas A. Piraino / Jr. / STEPHEN E. MARGOLIS / Dennis W. Carlton / Renato Mariotti / Charles M. Gastle / Jaison Thomas / Mark A. Lemley / Carl Shapiro / John J. Flynn / Jeffrey A. Eisenach / Benjamin Klein / Susan Boughs / David S. Evans / ALAN REYNOLDS / David K. Lam / Samuel Noah Weinstein / DEBORA L. SPAR / Darren Bush / Thomas Penfield Jackson / Robert D. Willig / Max Schanzenbach / John E. Lopatka / Thomas M. Lenard / George L. Priest / Lawrence Lessig / Edward Felten / STEVEN J. DAVIS ET AL / RICHARD A. POSNER / /

Position

Associate Professor of Law / General Analysis / author / Professor / District Judge / attorney / software litigation attorney / Judge / Priest / /

Product

Microsoft Corporation Portable Audio Device / Explorer / Windows / Windows 98 operating system / Windows 98 / /

ProgrammingLanguage

Java / L / /

ProvinceOrState

Virginia / Connecticut / Washington / North Carolina / /

PublishedMedium

SUNDAY HERALD / /

Technology

operating system / software technologies / web-browser technology / Java / COMPETITION AND ANTITRUST IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY / operating systems / Cable TV / /

URL

http /

SocialTag