Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Law / New York v. Ferber / Miller v. California / Obscenity / Roth v. United States / Osborne v. Ohio / Stanley v. Georgia / Pornography / First Amendment to the United States Constitution / Pornography law / Sex and the law / Censorship


Reproduced with the permission of Temple Law Review Volume 71 (c)1998 Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND CHILD NUDITY: WHY AND HOW STATES MAY CONSTITUTIONALLY REGULATE
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2008-01-07 15:12:10

Open Document

File Size: 181,21 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

New York / Jacksonville / /

Country

United States / /

Event

Judicial Event / /

Facility

(c)1998 Temple University / TEMPLE LAW REVIEW / University of Nebraska College / Supreme Court / Temple Law Review Volume / United States Supreme Court / /

IndustryTerm

model law / child pornography law / state law / applicable state law / mass mailing advertising / law restricting children / /

Organization

United States Supreme Court / Temple University / UN Court / Ginsberg Court / New York State Legislature / Ferber Court / Massachusetts legislature / Ohio Supreme Court / the University of Nebraska College of Law / /

Person

JUDITH A. REISMAN / Jock Sturges / Josephine R. Potuto / Prince / John Quigley / White / Benjamin J. Vernia / Robert Mapplethorpe / Roth / Scalia / David Hamilton / Sally Mann / See Miller / L. Steven Grasz / Stanley / Patrick J. Pfaltzgraff / /

Position

producer / Amendment liberty interests protecting teacher / Prince / Chief Deputy / Deputy Attorney General for the State of Nebraska / EXECUTIVE / Attorney General / law clerk / /

ProvinceOrState

Nebraska / Kentucky / Ohio / Oklahoma / Florida / California / Georgia / Massachusetts / Colorado / /

SocialTag