The Kyoto Economic Review 78(1): [removed]June[removed]Samuelson’ s Implicit Criticism against Sraffa and the Sraffians and Two Other Questions †

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2009-11-25 22:51:42 David Ricardo Cambridge capital controversy Piero Sraffa Neo-Ricardianism Heckscher–Ohlin model General equilibrium theory Ian Steedman Ricardian economics Classical economics Economics International economics International trade		The Kyoto Economic Review 78(1): [removed]June[removed]Samuelson’ s Implicit Criticism against Sraffa and the Sraffians and Two Other Questions † Add to Reading List Source URL: www.shiozawa.net Download Document from Source Website File Size: 541,17 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Microsoft Word - RolM.doc DocID: 1oIlf - View Document
	Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 17, Number 4 —Fall 2003—Pages 227–235 Comments To be considered for publication in the Comments section, letters should be relatively short—generally DocID: 1ajCQ - View Document
	1 Book Review Economics of Space and Time: Scientific Papers of Tönu Puu, edited by Åke E. Andersson, Martin J. Beckmann, Karl-Gustaf Löfgren, and Anders Stenberg. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, xvii + 265 DocID: 1aeug - View Document
	The Aggregate Production Function: ‘Not Even Wrong’ DocID: 19XZ0 - View Document
	Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 17, Number 1—Winter 2003—Pages 199–214 Retrospectives Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? Avi J. Cohen and G. C. Harcourt DocID: 19Lnj - View Document