Brown / LG Electronics Inc. / GE / Plantronics / Ford / CMI Inc. / /
Country
United States / /
Currency
USD / / /
Facility
University of Utah / Highway Patrol / /
IndustryTerm
permit hands-free devices / hands-free devices / cellular telephone / pace car / gas pedal / road surface software / interactive information delivery systems / pace car brake lights / car-following paradigm / mobile telephone task / electronic devices / car-following scenario / pace car deceleration / handheld devices / mobile telephone use / pace car driving / cellular device / /
MedicalCondition
chronic impairment / /
MusicGroup
I. D. / /
Organization
Federal Aviation Administration / Institutional Review Board / World Health Organization / University of Utah / Salt Lake City / Department of Psychology / National Highway Transportation Safety Administration / Human Factors and Ergonomics Society / National Highway Traffic Safety Administration / Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association / U.S. Department of Transportation / Utah State Legislature / /
Person
Amy Alleman / Frank A. Drews / Joel Cooper / Jonathan Butner / Danica Nelson / Dennis J. Crouch / Williamson / Ralph Becker / David L. Strayer / Kory Holdaway / / /
Position
driver / cell phone driver / valid driver / cell phone driver and a drunk driver / Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver / drunk driver for two reasons / research assistant / /
A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver David L. Strayer, Frank A. Drews, and Dennis J. Crouch, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah Objective: The objective of this research was to determine the r