Group Polarization and 12 Angry Men Cass R. Sunstein Deliberating groups, including juries, typically end up in a more extreme position in line with their predeliberation tendencies. A jury whose members are inclined, be - Sunstein - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	Group Polarization and 12 Angry Men Cass R. Sunstein Deliberating groups, including juries, typically end up in a more extreme position in line with their predeliberation tendencies. A jury whose members are inclined, be Add to Reading List Document Date: 2013-02-25 08:51:34 Open Document File Size: 58,41 KB Share Result on Facebook City New York / Cambridge / / Company 12 Angry Men Cass R. Sunstein Deliberating / Juror 8 / Harvard University Press / Columbia Law Review / California Law Review / Group Polarization / 12 Angry Men / / Country United States / / / Facility University of Chicago Law School / University of Chicago / / Organization Karl N. Llewellyn Distinguished Service / Harvard University / the University of Chicago / University of Chicago Law School / Harvard College / / Person Henry Fonda / / Position Emperor / Professor / President / Bishop / incumbent president / / ProvinceOrState Colorado / / PublishedMedium California Law Review / Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin / Journal of Experimental Social Psychology / Human Relations / Columbia Law Review / The Free Press / Journal of Personality and Social Psychology / / SocialTag Government Group polarization 12 Angry Men Jury Cass Sunstein Deliberation Polarization Twelve Angry Men Juries in England and Wales Juries

Group Polarization and 12 Angry Men Cass R. Sunstein Deliberating groups, including juries, typically end up in a more extreme position in line with their predeliberation tendencies. A jury whose members are inclined, beAdd to Reading List