<--- Back to Details
| First Page | Document Content | |
|---|---|---|
 Date: 2005-07-11 13:17:21Apprendi v. New Jersey Blakely v. Washington Appeal Harmless error Standard of review Jury Ring v. Arizona Cunningham v. California Law Appellate review Legal procedure |
Add to Reading List |
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc STATE OF ARIZONA, ) | Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.docDocID: 1uTN7 - View Document |
| RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document |
| DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.DocID: 1aJGU - View Document |
| PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________DocID: 19veD - View Document |
| The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities LawsDocID: 141Ic - View Document |