<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Hopwood v. Texas / Regents of the University of California v. Bakke / Gratz v. Bollinger / Equal Protection Clause / Antonin Scalia / Narrow tailoring / Strict scrutiny / Supreme Court of the United States / United States Constitution / Law / Case law / Grutter v. Bollinger
Date: 2013-06-24 10:16:13
Hopwood v. Texas
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Gratz v. Bollinger
Equal Protection Clause
Antonin Scalia
Narrow tailoring
Strict scrutiny
Supreme Court of the United States
United States Constitution
Law
Case law
Grutter v. Bollinger

[removed]Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin[removed])

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 207,81 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

ICON·S WORKING PAPER SERIES DON’T WASTE YOUR VOTE (AGAIN!). THE ITALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISION ON ELECTION LAWS: AN EPISODE OF STRICT COMPARATIVE SCRUTINY

DocID: 1snZa - View Document

Freedom of religion in the United States / Supreme Court of the United States / Law / United States federal legislation / Religion in the United States / Religious Freedom Restoration Act / Employment Division v. Smith / Strict scrutiny / Sherbert v. Verner / Free Exercise Clause

Religion Clauses (two of them) CLII, F15, Gowder Free exercise and establishment: are they

DocID: 1rhT1 - View Document

Civil rights and liberties / United States constitutional law / Rational basis review / Strict scrutiny / Equal Protection Clause

Equal Protection 3 Rational Basis Gowder ConlawII 2015 Importance of

DocID: 1p560 - View Document

Equal Protection 2 Sex/Gender, Intermediate Scrutiny Gowder, ConlawII 2015 Intermediate vs Strict Scrutiny

DocID: 1lzKL - View Document

BELL.3FMT:14 PM Free Speech, Strict Scrutiny, and SelfHelp: How Technology Upgrades Constitutional

DocID: 1kNun - View Document