Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Electric power / Floating wind turbine / Wind turbine design / Wind turbine / Tension-leg platform / Turbine / REpower Systems / IEC 61400 / Oil platform / Energy / Wind turbines / Technology


Quantitative Comparison of the Responses of Three Floating Platforms
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2013-09-30 13:41:26


Open Document

File Size: 712,84 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Stockholm / /

Company

International Energy Agency / Sustainable Energy LLC / /

Country

Germany / Norway / Japan / United States / China / Sweden / /

/

Facility

bridge Available / Three Floating Platforms J. Jonkman National Renewable Energy Laboratory D. Matha University of Stuttgart / Port Royal Road Springfield / /

/

IndustryTerm

orders@ntis.fedworld.gov online ordering / oil and gas operations / servo-elastic tool / simulation tool / onshore and offshore applications / given installation site / aero-hydro-servo-elastic simulation tools / reference site / partial safety factor response amplitude operator / offshore oil / energy marketplace / protection systems / energy / /

NaturalFeature

North Sea / /

Organization

International Electrotechnical Commission / U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service / U.S. Department of Energy / U.S. Department of Energy office of Scientific / MIT / US Government / Universitat Stuttgart / International Electrotechnical Commision Massachusetts Institute of Technology National Renewable Energy Laboratory / Alliance for Sustainable Energy / Three Floating Platforms J. Jonkman National Renewable Energy Laboratory D. Matha University of Stuttgart / United States government / /

Person

RAO RCC SWL / DLC DOWEC ECD IEA IEC / /

/

Position

contractor / Executive / representative / controller / /

ProvinceOrState

Tennessee / Virginia / /

Technology

radiation / aero / Simulation / /

URL

http /

SocialTag