<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States Constitution / Supreme Court of the United States / United States constitutional law / Federalism in the United States / Commerce Clause / Necessary and Proper Clause / United States v. Morrison / United States v. Lopez / Enumerated powers / National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius / Wickard v. Filburn / Taxing and Spending Clause
Date: 2012-12-10 10:01:23
United States Constitution
Supreme Court of the United States
United States constitutional law
Federalism in the United States
Commerce Clause
Necessary and Proper Clause
United States v. Morrison
United States v. Lopez
Enumerated powers
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Wickard v. Filburn
Taxing and Spending Clause

TESTIMONY VICKIE SUTTON PAUL WHITFIELD HORN PROFESSOR OF LAW, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON STATE AFFAIRS CHAIRMAN, SENATOR ROBERT DUNCAN

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.senate.texas.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 168,34 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

February 8, 2016 — Class Outline Federalism & Separation of Powers—not distinct doctrines but are intertwined and meshed together Three Modes of Legal Argument: 1. Common law style argument of analogizing or making f

February 8, 2016 — Class Outline Federalism & Separation of Powers—not distinct doctrines but are intertwined and meshed together Three Modes of Legal Argument: 1. Common law style argument of analogizing or making f

DocID: 1rdcQ - View Document

Understanding the Necessary and Proper Clause Paul Gowder We don’t have a lot of necessary and proper doctrine, but we do have guiding principles. Here’s an overview.

Understanding the Necessary and Proper Clause Paul Gowder We don’t have a lot of necessary and proper doctrine, but we do have guiding principles. Here’s an overview.

DocID: 1r7Bb - View Document

Day 13: Cases: New York v. United States Facts: Congress passed the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 which required states to provide for the disposal of such waste generated within their

Day 13: Cases: New York v. United States Facts: Congress passed the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 which required states to provide for the disposal of such waste generated within their

DocID: 1r5xO - View Document

Gowder - Constitutional Law I February 15, 2016 Outline Assignment 1 Case Briefs: U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (U.S. 1995)

Gowder - Constitutional Law I February 15, 2016 Outline Assignment 1 Case Briefs: U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (U.S. 1995)

DocID: 1qOFi - View Document

TESTIMONY VICKIE SUTTON PAUL WHITFIELD HORN PROFESSOR OF LAW, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON STATE AFFAIRS CHAIRMAN, SENATOR ROBERT DUNCAN

TESTIMONY VICKIE SUTTON PAUL WHITFIELD HORN PROFESSOR OF LAW, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON STATE AFFAIRS CHAIRMAN, SENATOR ROBERT DUNCAN

DocID: 1q6hb - View Document