FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW JUNE 2006 WHY JUDGES SHOULD ADMIT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE UNRELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2009-01-07 15:35:35 Memory Mental processes Criminal justice Criminal law Eyewitness identification Eyewitness memory Witness Mistaken identity Eyewitness testimony Cognitive science Mind Psychology		FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW JUNE 2006 WHY JUDGES SHOULD ADMIT EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE UNRELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY Add to Reading List Source URL: www.fclr.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 370,47 KB Share Document on Facebook

	149 The British Psychological Society DocID: 1qzeS - View Document
	ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 20 May 2014 doi: fpsygMemory impairment is not sufﬁcient for choice blindness to occur DocID: 1qvXW - View Document
	FORENSIC SCI SEM Marko Jelicic, et al. Questionable recollections of a shooting incident in a victim. FORENSIC SCI SEM, 2015, 5(2): 80, C3. Peer Reviewed 2157118X.5.2.C2 C DocID: 1pJUg - View Document
	APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 24: 885–Published online 17 July 2009 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: acpMemory Distrust and Acceptance of Misinformat DocID: 1ppcj - View Document
	Psychology, Crime & Law, December 2007; 13(6): 573581 Effects of collaborative recall: Denying true information is as powerful as suggesting misinformation HARALD MERCKELBACH, HUGO VAN ROERMUND, & DocID: 1p4kl - View Document