Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2006-12-12 18:04:08 Academic publishing Scientific method Publishing Knowledge Science Scholarly peer review Blinded experiment Academic journal Bias Richard T. Snodgrass Scientific journal		Editorial: Single- Versus Double-Blind Reviewing Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. In Add to Reading List Source URL: history.acm.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 256,50 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Gender Bias in IR Graduate Education? New evidence from syllabi1 Jeff Colgan is the Richard Holbrooke Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at Brown University. He can be reached at jeff_colg DocID: 1xVFu - View Document
	Influence of first two keystream bytes 2−7 Bias 1 Bias 3 Bias 5 DocID: 1xV86 - View Document
	Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber How bias clouds our thinking about diversity and inclusion go/pc-considered-harmful James Damore - damore@ July 2017 Feel free to comment (they aren’t disabled, the doc may just be o DocID: 1xV5N - View Document
	Can One Tamper with the Sample API? - Toward Neutralizing Bias from Spam and Bot Content Fred Morstatter, Harsh Dani, Justin Sampson, and Huan Liu Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA {fred.morstatter, harsh.dani, j DocID: 1xUgz - View Document
	Racial Bias in Police Investigations Jeremy West∗ UC Santa Cruz FebruaryAbstract DocID: 1vqcL - View Document