RELEVANCE Evidence must be directly or indirectly relevant to a fact in issue (Wilson Smith) Circumstantial evidence may be relevant (Plomp v R Shepherd v R) s55: Relevant evidence (Wilson Smith) The evidence that - The Wilson - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	RELEVANCE Evidence must be directly or indirectly relevant to a fact in issue (Wilson / Smith) Circumstantial evidence may be relevant (Plomp v R / Shepherd v R) s55: Relevant evidence (Wilson / Smith) The evidence that Add to Reading List Document Date: 2012-06-11 13:58:10 Open Document File Size: 339,07 KB Share Result on Facebook Company HCA / Caterpillar / Stoland Pty Ltd / Wilson / / Event Judicial Event / / Organization Reviving Memory IN COURT / Reviving Memory OUT OF COURT / UN Court / opponent/third party / / Person Hannes Lee / Van Beelen / Reviving Memory / / Position Counsel / The trial judge / guard / prosecutor / General / trial judge / Investigating official / Opposing Counsel / judge / Criminal proceedings Police officer / defendant/counsel / / ProvinceOrState New Brunswick / / SocialTag Relevance Character evidence Hearsay Witness Confession Hearsay in English law Witness impeachment Law Evidence law Evidence

RELEVANCE Evidence must be directly or indirectly relevant to a fact in issue (Wilson / Smith) Circumstantial evidence may be relevant (Plomp v R / Shepherd v R) s55: Relevant evidence (Wilson / Smith) The evidence thatAdd to Reading List