A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation Trevor BENCH-CAPON a , Henry PRAKKEN b Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK b Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrec

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2010-11-22 08:12:41 Logic Thought Argumentation theory Social epistemology Science Argument Preference Critical thinking Arguments Debating		A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation Trevor BENCH-CAPON a , Henry PRAKKEN b Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK b Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrec Add to Reading List Source URL: www.cs.uu.nl Download Document from Source Website File Size: 119,63 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Logical Reasoning as Argumentation, Or: How Lessons from the Law Are Changing Artificial Intelligence Lecture 1: Argumentation and Artificial Intelligence An overview is given of how ideas from argumentation theory have DocID: 1ugrj - View Document
	Elements of a Social Semantics for Argumentative Dialogue Rodger Kibble1 Abstract. This paper represents an initial attempt to pull together some parallel strands in argumentation theory, multi-agent systems, and philoso DocID: 1u1wE - View Document
	6 MEDI 401 S01 SpringMEDI 401 S01 DocID: 1rtzO - View Document
	Volume), Number 3 Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVisK.-L. Ma, G. Santucci, and J. van Wijk (Guest Editors) DocID: 1r6Yx - View Document
	Comparing Argument Diagrams Collin Lynch,a Kevin Ashley, a, b, 1 and Mohammad Hassan Falakmasir a a University of Pittsburgh Intelligent Systems Program b University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Learning Research and Dev DocID: 1r5SG - View Document