<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States courts of appeals / Law / Criminal law / Mandatory sentencing / Sentencing / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / Flores-Figueroa v. United States / Theft / Identity theft / United States v. Clark / Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States / Aggravated felony
Date: 2015-08-21 08:19:13
United States courts of appeals
Law
Criminal law
Mandatory sentencing
Sentencing
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Flores-Figueroa v. United States
Theft
Identity theft
United States v. Clark
Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States
Aggravated felony

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Federal Aggravated Identity Theft

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.fas.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 535,47 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

PRACTICE HANDBOOK ON CERTIFICATION OF STATE LAW QUESTIONS BY THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

DocID: 1ujGQ - View Document

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RULES OF PRACTICE PROCEDURE Effective 27 February 2018 Published Together with the Joint Courts of Criminal Appeals

DocID: 1ugxg - View Document

California law / Lake Tahoe / Tahoe Regional Planning Agency / United States courts of appeals / United States / California / Laurence Tribe / Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands /  Inc.

TRPA Answering Brief6PMDOCX

DocID: 1ru8T - View Document

Texas / United States / Texas law / Texas Legislature / Local government in Texas / Texas Association of Regional Councils / Texas Courts of Appeals / Dimmit County /  Texas

Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards, 2000 State of Texas County Comparison Within the Nation "

DocID: 1rsvM - View Document

Supreme Court of the United States / Law / United States courts of appeals / Old Chief v. United States / Huddleston v. United States / Intention / United States v. Thomas / Legal burden of proof / Batson v. Kentucky / Dennis Jacobs / Milan Smith

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No___________

DocID: 1rpJh - View Document