First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
![]() Date: 2014-01-08 18:20:18Rita v. United States United States v. Booker United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Mistretta v. United States Cunningham v. California Blakely v. Washington Kimbrough v. United States Gall v. United States United States v. Rodriquez Supreme Court of the United States Law Case law | Add to Reading List |
![]() | Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.docDocID: 1uTN7 - View Document |
![]() | RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document |
![]() | DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.DocID: 1aJGU - View Document |
![]() | PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________DocID: 19veD - View Document |
![]() | The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities LawsDocID: 141Ic - View Document |