Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Electronic engineering / Video compression / MPEG / High-definition television / Audio codecs / High Efficiency Video Coding / H.264/MPEG-4 AVC / X264 / VP8 / Videotelephony / Video / Data compression


Performance Comparison of H.265/MPEG-HEVC, VP9, and H.264/MPEG-AVC Encoders Dan Grois, Senior Member, IEEE,
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2013-11-06 00:00:10

Open Document

File Size: 447,49 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Geneva / Austin / Berlin / L.A. / JCTVC / /

Company

On2 Technologies / ITU-T / Google / Hertz / IEC Moving Pictures Expert Group / CRC Press / ISO/IEC / T Video Coding Experts Group / HEVC Reference Software / Intel / JM Reference Software / /

Country

Switzerland / United States / /

/

Event

M&A / /

Facility

Communication Systems Engineering Department Ben-Gurion University / /

IndustryTerm

storage media / open web media / reference software encoder implementation / kept technologies / selected software implementations / reference software encoder / network-based applications / x264 software library / reference software / low-delay applications / software optimizations / reference software configuration / audiovisual services / video coding technology / /

Organization

Republican Party / IEEE Image Processing Department / European Union / Communication Systems Engineering Department Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva / /

Person

Ofer Hadar / Johnny KristenAnd / Sara Baskeball / Ronald Bultje / Johnny KristenAndSara / Benaya Itzhaky / Detlev Marpe / Dan Grois / David Gómez-Barquero / Silva Cruz / Amit Mulayoff / Paul Wilkins / John Koleszar / /

Position

hb / representative / /

Product

x264 / VP9 / x264 VP9 HEVC / /

ProgrammingLanguage

R / D / /

Technology

RAM / MPEG-2 / secretly kept technologies / video coding technology / MPEG-4 / Random Access / Image Processing / /

URL

http /

SocialTag