On January 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that, inter alia, Mattel did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 5,308,080 and No. 5,419,564, whic - WHIC - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	On January 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that, inter alia, Mattel did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 5,308,080 and No. 5,419,564, whic Add to Reading List Document Date: 2005-01-07 14:35:54 Open Document File Size: 146,51 KB Share Result on Facebook Company Mattel Inc. / / Continent Europe / / Country Australia / United States / New Zealand / / Currency USD / / / Facility T]he Supreme Court / / Organization Supreme Court / / Person Bucher / Lawrence M. Sung / / / Position Vice President / / Product Farook / / ProvinceOrState California / / SocialTag Statute of frauds Oral contract Mattel Meeting of the minds Contract law Law Contract

On January 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that, inter alia, Mattel did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 5,308,080 and No. 5,419,564, whicAdd to Reading List