<--- Back to Details
| First Page | Document Content | |
|---|---|---|
 Date: 2014-04-25 19:34:56Rita v. United States United States v. Booker Cunningham v. California United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Gall v. United States Kimbrough v. United States Blakely v. Washington José A. Cabranes Apprendi v. New Jersey United States criminal procedure Law Case law |
Add to Reading List |
Do Not Delete[removed]:46 PM ARTICLE DEAD LAW WALKING: THE SURPRISING | Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.docDocID: 1uTN7 - View Document |
| RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document |
| DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.DocID: 1aJGU - View Document |
| PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________DocID: 19veD - View Document |
| The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities LawsDocID: 141Ic - View Document |